Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloise Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eloise Taylor

As per my comments on Wikipedia talk:Notability (royalty) no assertion of notability has been given here. This just seems like annothe royal-cruft article about some non notable person. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 17:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Xth in line to the Canadian (among other) throne is pretty notable, to deny notability on how it was achieved fails to conform to WP:NPOV, which is a policy, unlike the proposed guidelines on nobility. WilyD 20:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Not so notable outside of the family context. 28th and counting??? Harry and William etc, will have a few children, and before you knw it, they won't even be in the top 40 Merge with Lady Helen Taylor Ohconfucius 13:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as previous Taylorspawn noms; big fat zero gnews or gbooks hits. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per the other articles nominated by the same user -- Roleplayer 02:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Astrotrain 14:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• keep this please same reason as Estella Taylor and other nobility Yuckfoo 17:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Matthew Fenton Mad Jack 05:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.