Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Gotkine

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was keep. – ABCD 17:23, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Elliott Gotkine

• Del. No notability shown. Mikkalai 17:23, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I changed my mind after google search, but forgot to remove the note from the page. Mikkalai 07:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: This was apparently never listed on vfd, so I'm putting it on today's page. —Korath (Talk) 00:11, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep if this is is expanded to become encyclopedic. Klonimus 01:59, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Query Keep - Has this guy covered/performed in any way notable? How many South American correspondents does BBC have/had? ++ Tah.--ZayZayEM 02:28, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep He is notable enough in my opinion. He seems to have been a reasonably known journalist for at least 4 years in the bbc. From the bbc's site, it would seem that he is the South American correspondent, so I would assume they only have one. --Fuzzball! 04:10, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep sufficient notability, but expand. —Seselwa 05:43, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I've expanded the article to include more info. --Fuzzball! 06:02, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable journalist/reporter. Kappa 06:28, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, per Kappa. Mgm|^(talk) 08:12, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - David Gerard 09:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. SteveW 19:47, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I'm for keeping journalist articles. --Asriel86 00:57, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Wgfinley 21:03, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.