Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Meggs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Elizabeth Meggs
Prod removed. Non-notable artist and illustrator. Almost an A7 speedy candidate, but as there are references cited AfD seems more appropriate. The references seem to be primarily about her more notable father. David Eppstein 21:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 21:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Her website [1] doesn't have any evidence of notability. The references are all books written by her father, although I am sure it's true she has an essay in one of them. But, writing an essay does not make the subject notable.--Ethicoaestheticist 22:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Don't delete. Artist is emerging and mentioned in Print Magazine Print Mag Publication credits include exhibitions, illustration and design work. We should not claim an artist is not notable due to lack of major corporate gallery representation. Notability in the arts is a nebulous subject to assess. At times notability is determined by posterity, at times by commercial viability.Zxcvb83 12:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zxcvb83 (talk • contribs) — Zxcvb83 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete - notability on wikipedia is established through multiple reliable sources. I don't see this here nor am I able find these in a Google search. -- Whpq 21:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Article lacks significant coverage from reliable sources to establish notability. Dlabtot 01:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
