Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite Roleplay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  12:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Elite Roleplay

Non-notable neologism. A few sites are linked here as references, but the only one that comes close to meeting the requirements (Gaia) doesn't even use the term. Crystallina 18:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "Elite" as in "people who can spell"? Leibniz 18:29, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Elite delete per nom --Nydas 20:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete smells like OR; a neologism that no real "elite roleplayer" (or "literate roleplayer") actually uses. Keep only if we get really really good sources for this one and equally well sourced article for "misspelled powergaming". =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I actually meant that as a joke, but now that I'm coffeed enough, I realise we do have a decent article on that topic. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 12:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as essentially OR (and quite possibly, inherently POV), per wwwwolf. RandyWang (^chat/_patch) 12:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- per nom.--Peephole 13:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. RFerreira 21:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.