Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah W. Flake
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Insufficient argument made for notability. on top of which at least half the material is pasted from a web site. Herostratus 07:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Elijah W. Flake
Not every Civil War soldier is encyclopedic. This article, proffered by an apparent relative, is a doubtful case regarding notability at best. His service is unexceptional; his (I assume) prominent relative doesn't make him notable. The only thing that even brings him close to notability is that he dictated his experiences of the Monitor/Merrimac battle, and that account doesn't seem greatly relied on by historians. I found it on a long list of references about the Monitor. Wehwalt 19:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, non-notable. Soltak | Talk 22:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Someone who wrote a first hand history of one of the most important 19th century naval battles 52 years after the event might be expected to be a cited source in histories of the first battle between ironclads, so I am surprised to find few Google hits and no cites in the Proquest database of publications or in Google Scholar. He is apparently mentioned on p. 103 of "Covered with Glory: The 26th North Carolina Infantry at the Battle of Gettysburg (Paperback) by Rod Gragg," per Amazon.com. Edison 23:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Not surprising. If Flake didn't have a post which allowed him to observe much, his pamphlet probably wouldn't have been too informative. And his memory likely had faded in 52 years.--Wehwalt 00:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, hundreds of people served on the Virginia, and many veterans wrote pamphlets (most distributed locally). Being present at a famous battle isn't notability. --Dhartung | Talk 00:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 19:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
