Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Oliveiro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eli Oliveiro

Information is factually inaccurate and misleading. The photos used are copyrighted and no official permission was granted in their use. Please do the right thing and vote for it's immediate removal. Thank you. Dept. of Media Relations, Office of Eli Oliveiro(first delete vote) Solitudinal (talk · contribs)

• Comment: The photos have either been dumped or orhpaned. However, the remaining two do assert permission from the office to release under the GFDL. Stifle 22:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy A6. Regardless of whether or not if it's true (and I have no idea), it still reads like an attack page.--み使い Mitsukai 05:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable. --Vsion 05:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Delete speedily with extreme prejudice. TheRingess 06:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, per nom. Information is factually inaccurate and misleading. The photos used are copyrighted and no official permission was granted in their use. Please do the right thing and vote for it's immediate removal. Thank you. Dept. of Media Relations, Office of Eli Oliveiro Solitudinal 06:09, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I believe we can still claim fair use, which supersedes copyright, although I am not sure about his notability, which would undermine a fair use claim (requires public eye). Also, this is not a "vote", this is a discussion. Elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (Be eudaimonic!) 23:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Procedural Comment. Speedy should not be applied, even if CSD are met. Between bouts of reverting related edits, i have been preparing aids for reviewing the situation. One facet IMO needing investigation is the relationship between

on one hand the {{Singnet}} IPs, oeo (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) (read "Office of Eli Oliveiro") and two other new registered editors, who have advocated for this article and O&S Group,

and

on the other Solitudinal (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) and the tumultuous sites www.o-eo.com and www.islamicgem.com.

One possibility is that the articles should be blanked (not deleted), and retained for the sake of the evidence their histories contain, after renaming them as subpages of the respective talk pages. (The redirects resulting from the moves of course to be deleted.)
--Jerzy•t 06:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity bio. *drew 07:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup as per Jerzy. Any person or organisation who has a Department of Media Relations must have some claim to notability as does a man who appears on the cover of magazines with the Malaysian Prime Minister. Capitalistroadster 08:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I've seen neither the magazines nor the Department of Media Relations, and it doesn't look like he can support a respectable website. IMO the coverage on website of (purported) newspapers suggests he's written one tantalizing press release that suckers have treated as gospel. Please also note my reservations do not point toward a Keep vote, but toward a possible Move-Outside-Main-Namespace, with deletion of redirect.
    --Jerzy•t 10:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
    
• Keep and clean up as per Jerzy and Capitalistroadster. - TRDriver 09:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, vanity bio. Never heard of this person before, most probaly a hoax. --Terence Ong 09:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hoax or non notable. A "well known entrepreneur of South East Asia and the Middle East" and a "CEO of a conglomerate" returning 24 results on google?
  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dodo bird (talk • contribs) 10:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. At Talk:Eli Oliveiro i've added a list of the 4 new registered editors and 9 IPs who've been involved, and a chronology of edits for the 18 day period of edits, counter edits, and pauses. I am still not satisfied with my mental picture of it, and i would hope at least one or two editors who think they do have a clear picture, would test it by inspecting these tools, then report back. I'll be checking its accuracy soon, so watch that page for corrections if you see anything that seems significant to you.
  --Jerzy•t 10:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  

• Delete. Non-notable, if at all a real person. __earth ^(Talk) 06:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dodo bird. Stifle 22:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up Leidiot 03:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.