Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elemental programming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Elemental_programming

Possible WP:Vanity or WP:NOR- it was created and has only been edited by User:Hans_Oesterholt, who seems to be author of the website from which most of the text is copied. Most of the google hits are references to that page without actually discussing the concept - the exceptions in the first 50 ghits were using the term "elemental" in the sense of "basic", not in the metaphysical sense of this article. If it is actually notable in the Scheme programming world, it needs to indicate its notability, and at the least clarification of the copyright. Jamoche 23:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As a note, the opening paragraph is from this site - http://www.elemental-programming.org/ep.html - it's probably not a copyvio since the same person appears to have written both articles. At any rate, take a look at the google results. Just about every hit is a reference to elemental-programming.org. If such a thing does exist, it doesn't seem to be but so notable. It looks like a neologism that one person is pushing. I read the full article on his site and I'm not entirely convinced that it isn't patent nonsense. BigDT 23:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I agree, looks like Vanity and OR —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mets501 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC).
• Delete as rather nonsensical. Stifle (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research in its purest form. —Ruud 21:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Allan McInnes (talk) 23:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Koffieyahoo 01:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.