Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element Yachts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, as the deletion arguments were vague and unexplained. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 17:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Element Yachts
Nominated for notability issues. Moosato Cowabata (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep The company appears notable; it has a track record and produces notable products. --Stormbay (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GJ (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as per Stormbay. Matt Deres (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. The company may produce some very fine boats, but there is no assertion that it is an industry leader; or that it has received any substantial news coverage; or that its boats are the fastest, lightest, or something-est in the world, etc. Therefore, fails WP:CORP. RJC Talk 19:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment A company need not be an industry leader or hold a record of some kind in order to be sufficiently notable for inclusion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Water sports has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment It appears that the mother and grandmother companies produced notable products, but that the present company ... has some problems. For instance, their website subscription has expired. I've pulled some information together on the talk page about their Contour line of products. I would argue that if past notability can be demonstrated, present struggles should not prejudice the production of a proper article. My thinking from the searches I've made so far is that words on this company appear in the specialty press of yachting and trimaran racing and might not be as extensive as desired on-line. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. The reason why I'm not flexing the So-Fix-It muscle is that I am ignorant about boats and boating - the article should be edited by someone at least noddingly familiar with the field. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
