Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronics Engineering Services

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Electronics Engineering Services

Electronics Engineering Services (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

As per WP:CRYSTAL and it doesn't explain the topic. Pupster21 Talk To Me 12:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Save it.Its a new topic and i think has started off well and it should expanded in future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manavbhardwaj (talk • contribs) 13:49, 12 May 2008
  • Delete. Am inevitable factor today in the globally competitive electronic components industry. In other words, a non-notable neologism that somebody hopes to milk as next week's management fad buzzword. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-encyclopaedic neologism. Probably promo spam as well. Oli Filth(talk) 15:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep/Save - The article has been improved further, please review again. This talks about the services for design engineers and the electronics industry overall which they are using to make their electronic designs less costly, effective, less time consuming and help them reach out to each other for any support. Do consider keeping it. User:Manavbhardwaj(talk) 15:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Note: This is a second keep vote by User:Manavbhardwaj. Nsk92 (talk) 16:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. A weird mixture of an WP:OR essay, a how-to manual, with a strong wiff of WP:ADVERT. The subject of the article is not well-defined. No sources cited, per WP:RS. Nothing to demonstrate notability per WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. A Delete vote of Smerdis of Tlön has been changed to Keep by User:Manavbhardwaj. Here is the diff proving it: [1]. Such actions are unacceptable! I have changed the vote back to the original Delete. Nsk92 (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. I may have deleted something here as i did not know how and what to do here. I was only correcting my own comments though in that case i might hv repeated too as indicated above. I deeply regret if i did something against the rules.--User:Manavbhardwaj Can this article be considered for merger? or improvement? Please suggest.
  • Since you didn't change the actual explanation of what I said, I'm inclined to assume that it was only a case of unfamiliarity with the format of these discussions and the editing software.

    On the other hand, Wikipedia is generally not the place to propose new business models or plans. Our requirements of "notability" and "reliable sources" are jargon here; but what they seek to guarantee is that article subjects not be new ideas, but pre-existing ideas that are well established enough to be noticed by disinterested third parties. This makes it difficult to suggest places where this might be merged, and I am not familiar enough with electronics engineering as a business to suggest some other place where your text might be more welcome. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

  • I agree. but this is not a new model or a concept, if you search google with this title, you will see many resources available to this on the net already. User:Manavbhardwaj


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.