Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electromagnetic suspension
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to Magnetic levitation. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:33, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Electromagnetic suspension
Original resaerch. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- RHaworth 13:01, 2005 July 20 (UTC)
- Delete article as written describes a device which has not yet even been demonstrated practical -Harmil 13:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a crystal ball blah blah blah. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 14:58, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for good reasons given by nominator. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --//-- Pavel Vozenilek 20:30, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- redirect per Carnildo's sugestion would be fine too. Pavel Vozenilek 23:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Question: isn't this what the Japanese monorail uses? And if it is, can we redirect this there? -Splash 21:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- It isn't a monorail, it is a magnetic levitation train. That article uses the exact phrase "Electro-Magnetic Suspension" so I will change my vote to redirect. -- RHaworth 23:30, 2005 July 20 (UTC)
- Perhaps should redirect to magnetic levitation instead, since the general principle applies to more than just trains. --Buuneko 23:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. What's being described sounds like magnetic levitation being applied to building automobile suspensions. It's got exactly the same problems that a simple coil spring suspension does: undamped oscillation leading to motion sickness. Nothing particularly original there, but not worthy of an article. Might be suitable for a redirect to magnetic levitation. --Carnildo 23:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Magnetic levitation. JamesBurns 08:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.