Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Bandito's

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El Bandito's

Probable hoax, ungooglable touch rugby team in ungoogleable league. Looks like a student joke -- Aim Here 01:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep . I am a Mass Communications and Marketing Lecturer at the Nelson Polytechnic . The internet was set as a democratic , area of free speech . These participants are engaging in the aforementioned activity , however I believe some of the material to be unapproapriate . With some deletion of material in a few places , I believe the article has to be kept on wikipedia .

In summation there is a fine line between what teams can be registered on wikipedia . Professional teams and amateur teams that exist are both approapriate for submission in my educated perspective . User:Mogsheen Jadwat

  • Keep It is a worldwide club that has about 1000 members, across the world, we ahve even made the news in our country of New Zealand —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljd47 (talk • contribs)
  • keep HI i am from poland. Thanxs to this website i took a real interest in touch and have now been offered a scholarship to Oxford UNiversity, to play in their touch team! I can't thank the makers of this article enough! (Svendon)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.36.179.65 (talk • contribs) 07:37, February 28, 2006 (UTC).

  • keep JUst because you cant google it doesnt mean it isnt a club! We aim to expand our club right around the world, so bandits can take part in our bitter club.(the wet bandit)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.36.179.65 (talk • contribs) 07:33, February 28, 2006 (UTC).

  • keep It's a proper club , with real players . We play in the Belfast Touch League , which is an official competition . We just don't have an official website yet .—Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.181.7.1 (talk • contribs)
  • keep The Bandito's are a well followed team in Chch ,don't delete the info on the club . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.7.1 (talk • contribs)
  • Speedy delete as club with no assertion of notability. Playing social touch football is not an assertion of notability.

Capitalistroadster 01:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep What's the problem with it? Makes Wikipedia more exciting. Lighten up! --Teamplayer 03:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
editor's 17th edit on WP. 11 of the previous 16 have been to El Bandito's. Grutness...wha?
  • Delete. This appears to be a social touch club, and that isn't sufficient to warrant an encyclopedia article.-gadfium 04:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Doesn't meet encyclopedic standards. Cyde Weys 04:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable, unverifyable, meatpuppet supported. --InShaneee 04:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Unencyclopædic vanity publishing; unverifiable through Google. There must be better places than WP within which this information can be placed - the club's own website, for example? This information can form the basis of such as website, if required.  (aeropagitica)  07:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Hoax. -- Samir ∙ TC 07:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per (aeropagitica). CrypticBacon 08:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, seems probable hoax. - TRDriver 08:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Probably Hoax and if it isn't it is still below the level of notibility required. - SimonLyall 09:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. NN. I'm from NZ and have never heard of them --Midnighttonight 09:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn and hoax. --Terence Ong 10:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete probably a hoax, if real is non-notable. Avalon 11:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete probable hoax especially as some of the socks comments are nonsense MLA 12:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete...--Isotope23 14:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, or move to BJAODN. --Tone 16:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete hoax or unverifiable, per Avalon. ergot 16:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Claim to fame is participation in non-notable sports league. No references. Almost certain vanity.  Cdcon  18:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. As a fan of El Banditos I am highly offended by any calls to delete. Caleby 13:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as unverifiable. In regards to a previous comment, I highly doubt that the University of Oxford has anything to do with this, and the town of Oxford, New Zealand has less than 2,000 citizens - doesn't seem like a place for a university. -- Mithent 01:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

There is a university of Oxford in England however

  • Delete. Not notable. zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Pretty sad Google results. NN. OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Should have saved this for April 1. Moriori 08:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the article, delete the sockpuppets, and tell one of them that British universities like Oxford don't have scholarships for touch rugby (and there is no university at Oxford, NZ - a couple of milk bars and a pub and that's about it). Sheesh. Grutness...wha? 23:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep there is no reference to the University of Oxford on the website . The side is from Christchurch , New Zealand Vertigo
  • Delete, totally unencyclopaedic. I may have run into the team while refereeing tag rugby, though. Stifle 23:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Pure vanity. Eivind 02:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Vanity page, appears that most of the keep votes are by the same person, or persons. rmosler 08:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.