Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekspreso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Cleared as filed. 05:22, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ekspreso

Private project, not spoken by anyone, certainly not worth an entry. Ncik 22:24, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 03:56, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, even apparently has articles on other language pedias and has been around quite a while, how's it gone two years like that? I'm assuming it's real. NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 05:11, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. One of the better-known examples of post-WW2 auxlangs. --IJzeren Jan 09:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• delete better known, this is as good as it gets? Pete.Hurd 04:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I'm not a champion of auxlangs, being an artlanger myself, but it's certainly verifiable that this one has generated some interest - somebody's selling t-shirts and mugs with the slogan on! --PeteBleackley 12:01, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; not all auxlangs are notable, but I think this one is. MCB 19:12, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.