Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ejaz Fiaz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ejaz Fiaz

Ejaz Fiaz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Naveed Fiaz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Ejaz Fiaz and his brother Naveed were questioned by police in the wake of the 7 July 2005 London bombings and received a flurry of publicity. It later turned out neither Ejaz nor Naveed was an object of the investigation, and neither was ever charged with anything. I believe that WP:BLP requires we remove these articles at this time despite their obvious appearance in media. Dhartung | Talk 03:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.--RyRy5 ^{Talk to RyRy} 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom. Neither is notable, and privacy is an issue. Anturiaethwr (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both. This really doesn't fall under speedy, but this does need to go away ASAP. Dhartung's analysis of the article is spot-on. Cover the event, not the person, etc etc. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 06:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a BLP concern; speedy aside, they basically fall under WP:BLP1E. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 06:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom; they are pretty clearly not notable. --Deadly∀ssassin 00:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.