Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eighternity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Proto///type 14:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eighternity

Advertising text and link for a commecial product P2pauthor 22:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - I'm tempted to say that the idea is notable. The text needs to be cleaned up so that it's no longer a marketing spiel. - Richardcavell 00:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's a diamond cut (there are lots) and makes no assertions of notability beyond marketing platitudes. Eluchil404 03:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 19:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, blatant advertising. --Coredesat talk 22:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Let's see if I'm getting this right: Eighternity is a (presumably patented, if you can patent such things) way to cut a diamond, and also the name of a company that holds the patent and makes jewelry. At least I think that's it. It's all rather confusing, and the two concepts are mushed together. Eighternity the company doesn't seem notable; it's another jewelry company. Eighternity the cut... well, first of all, only one company is (or, presumably, can) use that cut, so how notable is that? And there are a lot of ways to cut a diamond; can't we include them in diamond or all collected into one article? I wish I knew more about diamonds, but unless educated otherwise, my spider-sense says Delete as spamcruft. Herostratus 01:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete ad copy, contains no encyclopedic material. Pete.Hurd 02:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete The subject of this article is not established in the diamond industry and mainly promotes the product itself, much like in advertorials. There are many diamonds that can claim what this diamond can claim. Delete Barreview 04:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.