Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eight Oaks Co-op, Vancouver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 07:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eight Oaks Co-op, Vancouver

Article is minutiae about some multiple-unit housing complex, is in no way encyclopedic. Bumm13 04:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable sleeping silo. Sandstein 04:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 42 units = NN.--Firsfron of Ronchester 05:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Coredesat 07:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don;t see how this is notable. Kevin 09:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete buildings are not inherantly notable and this article does not assert the buildings notabiltiy Ydam 10:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Can I write an article on my apartment building, too? 23skidoo 12:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonnotable. Seriously, assume good faith and all, but who the heck thinks that this sort of thing is encyclopedic? Gah. -- Docether 15:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable housing complex. JIP | Talk 18:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. --Danielrocks123 22:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.