Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian god of rice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by RHaworth. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Egyptian god of rice and John Percy

  • John Percy was not the Egyptian God of Rice. Hoax. Delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • These articles were good for a laugh, but are they even worthy of AfD? --timc | Talk 15:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
    • Technically, "hoax" is not a speedy criterion, so yes, AFD it is. Besides the author removed the speedy tags. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • See also this user's Victorian carpenters, LVCA and Royal_carpentry_loophole 'articles', which I marked for Speedy Delete. Also the nonsense added (and since reverted) from Horncastle. I think this is vandalism rather than a hoax, but if we need to debate it, then I go for Delete. Redvers ★ Hello ★ Doings 15:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete — Strange. Double-checked google but got no good matches on "John percy" "god of rice", obviously. :) — RJH 15:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Nice joke Prashanthns 16:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete BJAODN, funny though --Reflex Reaction 17:37, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per WP:V. Perhaps the author might consider Uncyclopedia. Capitalistroadster 00:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


All articles now deleted by RHaworth as patent nonsense. This AfD can therefore be closed. Redvers ★ Hello ★ Doings 09:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

  • I see that. Technically, "patent nonsense" means things which have absolutely no coherency and no meaning at all. But enough for technicalities, these things clearly ought to be deleted, so I won't protest too loudly. Closing the debate now. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.