Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Berridge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No consensus, I looked at the comments, and the arguments to keep were pretty strong. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edward Berridge
Non notable fanzine writer. THe one example of publication outside of a fanzine given turns out to be a reprint of fanzine material. ScottNestle 06:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreed with nom. At best, merge to Futurequake, though that is also of questionable notability. Wickethewok 19:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. —Centrx→talk 03:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- keep Fanzine reprinted material that appeared in professional magazine FIRST, not the other way around. The writer is also a published Fortean Times contributor. The nominator has a history of nominating small press magazines and creators for deletion - possibly due to personal bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.171.123 (talk • contribs)
-
- Actually because I consider them inherently non-notable. ScottNestle 20:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Tychocat 08:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep He is a professionally published author, even if you don't consider the small press, in which he has been prolific, notable (despite, as I've said a number of times on this page that they are important for the comic industry as a whole and are far more notable and importan than simple circulation numbers would suggest). (Emperor 14:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC))
- Weak keep Both Judge Dredd Megazine and Fortean Times are pretty notable, and his work does seem to have significant publication history. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.