Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edublog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edublog

non-notable dictdef. Begone. Timecop 03:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. nn. Incognito 03:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Timecop, I think you might be incorrect about the non-notable part - googling reveals a fairly broad reach for the term (including "edublog awards"). However, it is still a dicdef without too much room for expansion, so I'll say Transwiki to wiktionary. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 04:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Sure. Though the meaning is patently obvious and the article is cruft - 'water bottle is a bottle for storing water'. Not even sure it needs coverage of any kind. --Timecop 04:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps a one-liner in Blog if not already there. --Timecop 04:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

for the record for the closing admin, I'll accept either a delete or merge here also. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 15:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Hosterweis 05:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - or create a page about Bablogging, for people who like to blog from their bathrooms too -- Femmina 06:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - there's already an Educational section in Blog -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Blog#Educational. I see enough google hits (300k) to warrant mentioning the name there. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 07:55Z
• Delete this, mention in Blog#educational as per Quarl. Proto t c 12:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Edublog? I'm not laughing... --Depakote 15:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with maybe a one-liner in blog under genres (i.e. would accept merge as would some others here). Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since already mentioned at blog and does not justify its own article. Eusebeus 22:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Eusebeus. *drew 07:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Cptchipjew 08:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.