Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Reck Miranda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Shanel 00:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eduardo Reck Miranda

Nominated for speedy under A7 (person, no assertion of notability), but I feel the last paragraph (the bit about broadcasts and performances) is enough to make some degree of assertion of notability. So I'm nominating here, asking AfD to consider the subject's notability and the article's verifyability. As this is a technical nomination on my part, I don't express an opinion one way or t'other. Finlay McWalter | Talk 21:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note that the article was contributed by new user:Eduardo.miranda; I've asked Eduardo to consider whether userifying the article is the best option. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 21:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Seems fairly clearcut to me - I'm getting 585 Ghits from quite convincing sources like MIT Press [1] Dlyons493 Talk 21:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, publication record indicates notability met. Besides, if he's annoyed you, isn't it more satisfying to leave his self-penned article up with flubs like "he obtained my PhD" intact than to delete it . . . Monicasdude 22:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep if eduardo wants it to stay, I don't see why not; his research papers/publications establish his notability. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 23:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per everybody --Khoikhoi 02:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but cleanup: Contrary to the comment about flubs, I'd like to read a good encyclopedia, regardless of how annoying the subject may be. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.