Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edna Jean Garner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 17:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edna Jean Garner

Non notable minister, not sure if it's a nn-bio so placing it here Delete --Jaranda wat's sup 04:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I believe she is a notable minister in New Zealand, where she has published books on teaching for the deaf, and her Christian mission of working with the deaf.wikipedia. User:Embode
  • Keep with indication for cleanup and verification if she is indeed notable (and while they're at it they might indicate how she got married 9 years before she was born). Crunch 05:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Canley 06:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)"
  • Delete. The article makes no claim to notability. The two external links don't obviously mention her.-gadfium 07:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I was going to vote keep because I thought she was a minister but then I found out that she was only a minister. As that seems to be her biggest claim to notability I don't think this is notable enough. Delete. JIP | Talk 10:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per JIP. --Terence Ong 13:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, no claims to notability. Could have been speedied. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Proquest returns 0 hits.Uucp 16:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. NN and possible vanity. --Brian1979 15:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.