Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete with no prejudice against recreation if reliable sources can be found. JoshuaZ 18:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eddie Connor

Eddie Connor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Disputed speedy, then prod. Subject is not notable at all. No sources cited, cannot be verified. Google turns up no relevant links at all, except for WP and reflection sites. I'm not even sure this guy actually exists. Suspected to be a vanity article. Please delete. Realkyhick 23:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• delete - not really that notable in the grand scheme of things. Guroadrunner 23:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• delete - per nomination. The product of a single purpose account. Victoriagirl 23:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. east.718 00:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.