Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecomaterials

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete due to copyvio here. Deathphoenix ʕ 17:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ecomaterials

This appears to be an advert for a company that specializes in production of environmentally friendly material, rather than an article on them. Not my leg 22:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello: EcoSur is not a company, it is an NGO, non profit organization. Paulcoyote 22:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• I see, still an advert though, not an encylopedic article.

• Ok, I've removed all the mentions of EcoSur (except the firs one),and modified all the "We... ". I will post some articles (without any propaganda) about MicroConcrete tiles, adobe (earth) construction, puzollanic cement...Paulcoyote

• Delete Still basically an ad, nn neologism, and also copyvio. It's basically a cut and paste from their website [1] Fan1967 22:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I may be wrong on the nn neologism. I get 22,000 Ghits, so it may be a notable neologism, and a valid basis for an article, but not this article. This is still basically a copy of someone else's website. Fan1967 22:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• I've requested to someone to write a Encyclopedia Article about it. Paulcoyote 23:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.