Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco-evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eco-evolution

Eco-evolution (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

fails WP:NEO. RucasHost 05:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. Onnaghar ^{tl | co | @} 11:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete its a neologism Sasha Callahan 12:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Twelve leverage points, the article discussing her paper where she coined the term. Or, redirect to the notable creator, Donella Meadows. I wouldn't merge any information, as it's not sourced. There are a number of google hits for 'eco-evolution', so I'm open to some sourced information that this is a notable enough neologism to warrant its own article, if someone can dig up reliable sources. Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:NOT#DICT, and WP:NEO. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 16:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - The term is not used in academia. SolidPlaid 17:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neologism ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 20:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.