Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eccles College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep - nominator withdrew nom (and removed from log). Yomangani^talk 16:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eccles College

Slanderous and Childish etc Sharonlees 13:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• speedy delete per A6/A7. Ohconfucius 14:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but revert to the very first version of this article, and semi-protect temporarily. The article was apparently created in sincerity to report on an actual academic institution [1] but was vandalized by an anonymous user. --Metropolitan90 14:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and revert per Metropolitan90. High schools and high school level colleges are inherently notable, this just needs cleaned up. -- IslaySolomon 14:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I am about to be bold, revert to the unvandalised state and reinstall the AfD template. I suggest we draw a line under the opinions so far and re-give opinions. The edits will be completed in a couple of minutes and I am putting an arbitrary divider below this message. Fiddle Faddle 15:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep (vandalism has been removed) as secondary education establishments (like High Schools) are notable. But the article is very poor and requires urgent expansion and references etc. Fiddle Faddle 15:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep High schools and high school level colleges are inherently notable. -- IslaySolomon 15:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, high schools and colleges meet WP:SCH criteria. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 15:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• NOTE nominator has withdrawn nomination (see edit history of the article itself) but may be unaware that it should be stated here rather than removing the banner on the aticle. Please may we now Speedy Close to avoid confusion Fiddle Faddle 16:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.