Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebookers

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. The votes are: 3 to keep, 3 to delete (counting the nominator). -- BD2412 ^talk 02:36, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ebookers

Advertising. Page created by User:Ebookers. -maclean25 22:51, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

• delete "We believe that ebookers' merchant relationships are the amongst the best in Europe..." possibly POV-ed beyond what is salvageable —Tokek 22:43, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep. This is a major company, in the UK at least with regular television advertisements etc etc. I was shocked to realise they must not already have an article. They get 1,590,000 Googles and their website has an Alexa traffic rank of 3,469 with 306 incoming links. That's enough for me. It needs the ad-langugae removing but that is no reason for deletion. I have tagged it for cleanup. -Splash 23:46, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

• Why did you remove "Category: Leading Online Pan European retail travel company"? That was just funny. -maclean25 02:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Notable company. Capitalistroadster 00:41, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I really don't like advertising in Wikipedia. This article is an advertisement written by the company, unless the user's name and the articles name being the same is a coincidence (vanity?). The entirety of the article, with the exception of first sentence of the first and third paragraphs is "ad-langugae". The million hits on google are from other similar adverts (in various languages). Although...I could live with a cleaned-up version of the page (with no ad-language), though I do not intend to do the research on this company. - maclean25 02:34, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Obvious keep that needs a lot of work. I've marked it pov. We should have an article, and we'll probably get a good one sooner if we keep this than if we delete it. CalJW 13:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising. JamesBurns 06:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.