Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebionite Restoration Movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ebionite Restoration Movement

Non-notable subject Alecmconroy 21:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: This seems to be a very small religious group. After an extensive discussion, the content was removed from the "Ebionite" article for lack of notability, and was transferred to its own page, with the understanding that after a period of time, an AFD nomination would be made to see if the content merits inclusion in the encyclopedia. After about a month, I haven't seen anything that convinces me that the group is sufficiently notable. --Alecmconroy 21:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete - It may be a distinct religious movement, but the article does not make this clear. If it did I would vote to keep. JASpencer 07:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and merge the Ebionite Jewish Community article (also up for deletion) into this one. IZAK 06:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete small religious group of no demonstrated importance.--Peta 04:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Bobet 10:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I should mention-- when I say this is a "very small religious group", our best guess is we're talking 1-2 members total, such that this article borders on being a vanity page. --Alecmconroy 11:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn group, WP:V. Eusebeus 16:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Eusebeus. Pan Dan 20:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Alec made the case for lack of notability very well during an RFC with extensive discussion. Ovadyah 21:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless clear evidence of group being a real "movement" large enough to verify notability is introduced. Me and my brother haven't but the "Alpha Centaurians for Jesus" page in here yet, and we have two people, two cats and a dog with delusions of grandeur. Badbilltucker 21:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Existence not verifiable outside of a webpage of the alleged group. Jayjg (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.