Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eaxy

I could throw the book at it: violates WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:NEO for starters. Prod removed and doesn't seem to qualify as patent nonsense for a speedy. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 02:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 02:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Let's add WP:WINAD and WP:NFT to the list of offenses. It's tempting to vote speedy delete per WP:SNOW just to save time. --Daniel Olsen 03:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Speedy Delete per nom. and Daniel. TJ Spyke 03:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per above, WP:SNOW. Consequentially 03:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I ran across this when it was speedy-tagged and thought it was an obvious chuck-in-the-wastebin-to-save-everyone-time. Opabinia regalis 04:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• I've speedy deleted since it's clear this article carries no encyclopedic value and will be deleted as a result of this discussion (WP:SNOW as someone mentioned above). Why give it further exposure? _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 09:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.