Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eat Fat Get Thin

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 00:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eat Fat Get Thin

• Delete. A joke most likely.Marskell 10:00, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, surely?Grayum 10:04, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, complete nonsense. — JIP | Talk 10:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I've seen an article on a diet based on the film Supersize Me causing people to actually lose weight, but this is complete nonsense with a marketing title. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:43, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy pointless article Tekana 11:26, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

• Comments only: all books printed are perhaps not notable to qualify for encyclopedic entries. I am not aware of the notability of this book or its writer. --Bhadani 14:21, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• It appears, from a search, to be moderately well-known within its field. Weak Keep. Uncle G 10:22:29, 2005-08-24 (UTC)

Has anyone heard the theory that about half of published books in NA deal either with religion or dieting? This may be moderately well-known but I think we need a relatively high bar for diet books because a) its hard to distinguish them from ads b) the sheer volume of such material means notability is difficult to prove. Still delete tho the page looks better. Marskell 10:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

• week keap. I'm hungry. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:47, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.