Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] East Magazine
Not notable per WP:V. 'Nuff said. ukexpat (talk) 16:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No inherent notability; no 3rd party nontrivial coverage. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. NN Dreamspy (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I live in the area and it does deserve an entry on Wikipedia as the magazine is credited by the majority of the area as having vastly helped attract bigger name entertainment to the area through positively promoting what's on. The area's cultural activity would not be the same without it. However, these are just views and naturally impossible to find on the web to use as citations. Unfortunately, although the subject deserves recognition, it's very difficult to describe why. I would hate to see the article deleted but I guess it has to be under Wikipedia guidelines. theolimeister (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Source your claim and bring some references to prove the article is under wikipedia guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
