Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Lexham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] East Lexham
Article has almost no content, non-notable place. There is already an article on round-tower churches, and this adds nothing Lurker oi! 11:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - no assertion of notability. MER-C 12:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Per WP:NOTABILITY, Some topics are considered of inherent value for inclusion without the assertion of notability, such as cities, villages, lakes, rivers, and mountains. --Oakshade 00:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs more information about the community of East Lexham itself, as described at http://abstuk.co.uk/uk/east-lexham --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As much of an exclusionist as I am, I think it is pretty well established that cities, towns, and villages, no matter how small or obscure, are notable. And, as small communities go, this isn't a bad article - it has an interesting church, with a picture. --Brianyoumans 19:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --KFP (talk | contribs) 23:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Real town/village. Inherently notable. --Oakshade 00:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep we have clear precedent for articles on localities. Eusebeus 00:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep for the same reasons cited above; very clear precedent that all towns, villages, etc. are notable. Certainly needs to be expanded, however. --The Way 07:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep: Locality article. Please see List of cities in the United States for example. --Moreau36 20:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.