Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Logeais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Earl Logeais

Delete, non-notable. google search for Earl Logeais both with and without Purple heart turned up nothing in first several pages.-- Syrthiss 19:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: If the information was verifiable (i.e. cited sources), would that make the guy notable? If so, it should be tagged for citation first, I'd say. This could be a bit of oral history recording. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 19:39, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

  Yeah, I would accept that. I'm not entirely sure its not a hoax page though, based on me finding it by looking at the contributions of an Alexander Graham Bell vandal. The creator's contribs aren't *all* vandalism so I wanted it up here for comment. --Syrthiss 19:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: purple hearts are given for being wounded, not bravery. -- Kjkolb 23:54, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unverified and a possible hoax. As I said before, purple hearts are not for bravery. Also, a WWII soldier killing three enemy soldiers with his bare hands seems very suspicious. -- Kjkolb 05:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.