Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earjo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 03:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Earjo

Article is a hoax. No references could be found to back it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spookfish (talk • contribs)

• Delete for want of verification. Gazpacho 11:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, since it's just a random piece of fiction with no context to be found. - Bobet 13:13, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom +/- original research. Ifnord 15:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as Bollocks! (or unverifiable if you prefer) Jcuk 23:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- JJay 19:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.