Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E J Boys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 18:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] E J Boys

E J Boys (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was nominated for speedy deletion, but doesn't qualify: there are several claims to notability, enough to avoid speedy deletion. I'm moving this to AFD instead. Procedural listing, no opinion. Aecis^Brievenbus 22:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I tagged it for speedy originally (said tag got removed several times), the thing is here, none of the claims have been backed up. Also, check the logs, it'll go from "world's leading researcher into" to "the world's foremost authority" to "a leading authority" on his supposed subject matter. Just because the author claims the person in the article is notable, doesn't mean he is. --Whstchy 22:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Add on comment Also check what links to the page. The subject the person in the article researched doesn't even link to it. --Whstchy 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete on the premise that the subject doesn't even link to the page in question. Obviously non notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Actually there is a link to this page from the relevant article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darren1986 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment The link to the article was added by you user:Darren1986, after this appeared. Pardon me, but something smells of sockpuppets. Whstchy 18:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
    • just tryin to be helpful...a link is a link isn't it?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Darren1986 (talk • contribs)
      • Comment Yes, but you also removed CSD tags from an article without asking first.--Whstchy 19:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
        • Oops..sorry! I'm new at this. I thought that if you didn't agree with a deletion or the article had been amended you could remove the tags. My mistake.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.81.41 (talk • contribs)
• Delete unless sourced. I know this is valuable research but there is no, available, evidence that the artice subject has ever been noted. Nuttah68 12:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.