Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EUO

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] EUO

EUO (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Replacing second prod with AfD. Original prod reason was: No assertion of notability per WP:N / WP:ORG. No independent references (WP:V). Borderline db-advert. Prod removed with no comment by anonymous user (although cleanup and reference tags were put up. Second prod had similar concerns. ) Marasmusine 11:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 11:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - No assertion of notability and no reliable sources to verify those claims. Again. DarkSaber2k 11:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn per WP:WEB. YechielMan 20:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 03:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Three new external links have been added; Answers.com is just the wikipedia page anyway (and should be removed if the article is kept), Ultimadot and Ultima Proejct [sic] are directory listings. Marasmusine 21:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - if Wikipedia is all about destruction of information (ie censorship) then you might as well delete the article. But in 5 years when EUO is still around and bigger than Wikipedia, you guys will look like a bunch of simple minded bureaucrats when someone makes a new page on EUO. But in the meantime no body really cares. eggmceye, creator of EUO. — eggmceye (talk • contribs) has (surprise surprise) made no other edits outside this topic.
    • So, to avoid looking simple-minded, we should have articles on everything that might become notable in the future but isn't at the moment? Marasmusine 07:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.