Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENSCO Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 13:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ENSCO Inc.

ENSCO Inc. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Procedural nom. Reprod. Prodder's concern was WP:CORP. I abstain. - crz crztalk 04:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, this looks like an "about our company" type page. I can't see any evidence in the article that it meets WP:CORP. Thryduulf 07:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, sounds like advertising, fails WP:CORP criteria. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 08:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertSkierRMH 09:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice. Given that they seem to be some kind of military contractor that does business in both the USA and the PRC, this might be a notable business, but it ain't shown here. An article that overconfidently claims that the company is a provider of "solutions" must be rewritten from the beginning. (Unless, of course, they dissolve stuff.) - Smerdis of Tlön 15:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The work they do for NASA seems signifficant -confirmed here [1] and I've found at least a couple of WP:RS articles on them. [2] [3] --Oakshade 16:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.