Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDIFICE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Even with the removal of vandalism by User:RN, the argument that this organization does not meet WP:CORP guidelines, or general notability guidelines, holds. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EDIFICE

Advertisement, but even with a cleanup this company would still (in my view) not be notable, I can't seen it meeting any of the criteria on WP:CORP-- JoanneB 16:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Blatant spam. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 17:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • The most blatant spam has been removed, but the article still reads like promotional. - Mike Rosoft 09:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 23:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn't meet WP:CORP. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, now that spam has been removed. I made the original complaint about spam by email. EDIFICE is a non-profit standardisation organisation, does it need to conform with WP:CORP? If this is still considered AfD, maybe it should be merged to EDIFACT? --Veijari 21:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.