Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect the verifiable information from E-wrestling to Fantasy wrestling. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] E-wrestling

Fantasy wrestling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable hobby. No reliable sources, full of original resarch, fails WP:A. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 01:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:

Fantasy wrestling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 01:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Fantasy Wrestling as its the same thing as E-wrestling but with less content. However, Keep E-wrestling, 29000 Ghits suggests its a major internet trend. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 01:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Google hits aren't relevant, as the article would still fail WP:A with a million hits. We need reliable sources. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 01:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• If you want some sources, try this. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 23:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I just looked through all 21 pages of results, and didn't see a single source that an article could be written from. Perhaps you could provide some rather than just providing irrelevant search engine results? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 00:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as no attributable sources. Nol888_(Talk)^{(Review me please)} 12:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, as much as the article gets loads of spam, it is a a major and popular internet trend. Englishrose 16:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, per Englishrose. --EazieCheeze 06:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and merge into a single article. Just because it's not sourced doesn't mean it can't be, and there's enough of these out there that I'm sure a source can be found. --UsaSatsui 15:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment The article was created over two years ago and it's been tagged as unreferenced since June last year, how long do you suggest we wait until a source is found? If sources can be found then the article can be re-created using those. I refer you to WP:A, which states - The burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material. If an article topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 05:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• I disagree. Just because something isn't attributed doesn't mean it's not attributable. However, looking through this article again, I noticed that a lot of it is most likely OR and therefore unsourceable...and pretty poorly written, too. What really tipped the scales for me is this talk page comment. Therefore, I'm switching to Delete for E-Wrestling until such time as someone can write an unbiased, sourced article on it, or just put any useful info (none I can see) into Fantasy wrestling, for which I still say Keep.--UsaSatsui 16:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete just not notable and no reliable sources. SakotGrimshine 09:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment, I agree no reliable sources is a problem but the fact that it has millions of hits on google shows it is a notable and popular internet roleplaying game. Englishrose 21:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge with Fantasy wrestling (which obviously shouldbe kept, a verifiable sourcable, phenomena)--ZayZayEM 02:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.