Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Avery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dylan Avery

Non notable conspiracy theorist. All the relevant information has been merged into the Loose Change (video) article. Peephole 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The article's only claims of notability come from the subject's own PR maneuvers. --Aaron 19:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Tbeatty 19:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this article has been redirected and merged so many times, both to Louder than Words and Loose Change (video) that I am convinced there is nothing regarding Dylan Avery that can't be better covered in another article.--Rosicrucian 20:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom GabrielF 00:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and permanently protect so that Dylan Avery cannot recreate the article. Fails WP:BIO and is WP:VAIN. Morton devonshire 00:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Why would you think I'm him? I found this, and it seemed very bizarre that there was no article and it was redirected off. Does 4-5 (at least) news sources count as notable for a stub? · XP · 00:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Not a single one of the articles is specifically about him, so no they don't count. He has also produced only one film. Not enough to warrant his own article and everything is already merged with the Loose Change article.--Peephole 01:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep ...why delete, if he keeps getting cited as a notable film maker in a variety of notable international media? · XP · 00:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment because the entirety of his article can easily exist as a subsection of Loose Change (video), his only film, which he has only shown inclination of revising endlessly. He has directed one film. Why should he have an article seperate from said film? Where is his notability independent of it?--Rosicrucian 02:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Revise: Have an admin redirect to the movie article, and all all the new/complete info that one, which will make that article fully notable then as well--closing admin can redirect/protect this one then and just Keep on the other. Good idea, keeps the content in an appropriate manner entirely! · XP · 03:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge this can be better put into the movie article.  ALKIVAR™ 04:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Revise I agree with XP. -- Craigtalbert 06:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Revise/Merge Information can be put to use in another article --JRA WestyQld2 11:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Sandy 01:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect to Loose Change, Derktar 03:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC).
• Delete nn.--MONGO 05:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Loose Change (video). Much of the pertinent information is already there, but best to preserve the article history if there is anything more to be merged. --bainer (talk) 13:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Crockspot 16:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Dylan is mentioned in the Loose Change article, with that video his only claim to notability. Mentioning him in the video article suffices. --Aude (talk contribs as tagcloud) 01:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Aude. CWC(talk) 07:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Revise as per XP. Ok if it's not worth an article, but I hate to throw good information to the garbage when so many people die of ignorance.--SidiLemine 13:18, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Better merged with the movie article. Don't put all this information to waste!
• Delete Avery is already covered in plenty of detail in the Loose Change (video) article Jon m
• Delete This article is biased and was written by the subject and/or subject's "fanbase". It opens up irrelevant material on an otherwise credible site to the public and should be deleted.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.164.114.161 (talk • contribs) 04:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC).
• Delete or Redirect to Loose Change (video). (The merge suggested by bainer has apparently already been done, although it may violate GFDL. If Delete would violate GFDL, then Redirect.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect (protected) per nom. alphaChimp^(talk) 06:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge For now, he's not too notable by himself, but this info is definetely useful on the movie page. ArgentiumOutlaw 08:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete redundant per Loose Change (video), and even that is of questionable merit. Guy 10:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.