Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyke tyke (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 19:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dyke tyke

Dyke tyke (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article is glorified dicdef - if you cut out all the unverified, unsourced stuff, you've got a textbook dictionary definition, and Wikipedia is WP:NOT a dictionary. Also, lacks multiple reliable sources EMP 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment-This has previously been up for AfD before-EMP 07:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. YechielMan 15:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neologism that may be original research. Not for here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 02:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 13:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.