Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyke tail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 14:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dyke tail

Dyke tail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable neologism with 9 Google hits not related to this usage. Creator claims increasing usage and common usage in his travels. Apparently, creator is really interested in the subject because he got the AfD page completed before I finished with it. See his comment below. As he says, "a new slang term." Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 04:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

This page talks about a new slang term and the information is valuable on its own accord. Please see that there are photos with the article to support it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckbrow07 (talk • contribs)

Nice photo, but what is it's source? That's a separate issue. Anyway, the photo of a girl's head hardly establishes notability for the the neologism. Too new. Not encyclopedic. Oh and lest anyone doubt my internt. Delete (First time I ever saw a "keep" before the afd was listed in the log.) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 04:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete. Please see our policy on new words. Please see our policy on photos with blatant watermarks. Please get this thing off of here. Get me some snow to roll. Daniel Case 04:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- per policies cited by Daniel Case. This is possibly more appropriate for Wiktionary. Accounting4Taste 04:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, this term has been around a few years now but is unlikely to be covered in e.g. mainstream newspapers due to the word "dyke". If it ever gets into some of the weekly alternatives it might have a shot, but not yet. --Dhartung | Talk 05:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Neologism, unreferenced, copyvio pic...not to mention inherently POV. This belongs on Urban Dictionary, not WP.LaMenta3 06:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - it's not even on Urban Dictionary.--81.159.99.231 16:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:SNOW like Daniel suggests!! Burntsauce 21:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MADEUP. DWaterson 22:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.