Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyfuca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was copyvio. Johnleemk | Talk 13:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dyfuca

nn trojan/virus/malware Hirudo 18:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect to Internet Optimizer, it's the same thing. This is one of the more prevalent bits of malware out there. Could be interesting to expand on both the technical aspects and, if possible, the people behind it. - N (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Speedy delete per below. I'll create a new rediect once it's deleted. - N (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as blatant copyright infringement. See the original article here. Sycthos^Talk 00:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: This is not a speedy delete. Criterion A8 (speedy deletion of blatant copyvios) is only applicable if the article was created in the last 48 hours (this one wasn't even in the last 48 days). The reason for this is that Wikipedia mirrors are unlikely to cache the copyright violation in the first 48 hours of a page's existence. However, after that, the copyright violation procedure at the copyright problems page must be followed. Stifle 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.