Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DxO Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Tyrenius (talk) 03:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DxO Labs

DxO Labs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete fails WP:CORP, no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Although only a small stub, it seems to have a somewhat large company in France. I think we should keep and expand a bit.   jj137 ^♠ 21:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete The burden of proof is on those who wish to keep, to provide evidence of notability. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 21:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete withoutindependent, reliable sources that prove the company's notability. The onus, as stated by Shalom, is on the article's contributors to show notability. Keeper | 76 21:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC).

• Changing to keep per independent, reliable sources added. All better. Keeper | 76 15:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I added this article because I learned from a professional photographer that it was a leading image-processing software company. It was a stub because I don't know much about them. I have added some independent sources to the article which document their notability both for consumer and for OEM software. --Macrakis (talk) 04:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Browse the table of contents of any photo magazine and it'll come up. I've added three. Fg2 (talk) 11:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.