Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwight McBannerson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - a clear consensus. Whether a hoax or a vanity piece by a profoundly nn individual, either way it fails WP:V. TerriersFan (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dwight McBannerson

Dwight McBannerson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Very likely a hoax. Only hit on Google for the name is this article. No hits for the award in the final paragraph. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 22:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• delete- appears to be fictional. Rob Banzai (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete due to lack of references. Likely hoax. Stifle (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I wouldn't normally !vote delete on such a new article, but lack of g-hits and an SPA creator make this look like a blatant hoax. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 02:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete a hoax and/or something made up while bored Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete WP:HOAX. Ostap 03:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete may or may not be a real person but, either way definitely non-notable and non-verifiable Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.