Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duxbury Pier Light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duxbury Pier Light

Empty article. A picture and two links does not an article make. Spartaz 14:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. I think this article can be expanded; there are a lot of very short geography articles. It just needs some T-L-C and attention. Srose (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I did some research and added some information. In the process of researching, I discovered that this lighthouse does has claim to fame - it was the first lighthouse in the US to use a caisson spark plug. In light of this discovery, I change my vote to Keep.Srose (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Srose and the expanded information. —C.Fred (talk) 20:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Historic landmark. BigE1977 03:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment This nomination for deletion was not about the notability of the lighthouse; it was about the article having no text at all, even after it had been proposed for deletion and the PROD notice had been removed. As it has now been made into a sub-stub, it no longer qualifies for deletion as an empty article, but it still is a pitiful excuse of an article for a lighthouse. Extant lighthouses in the United States are very well documented in books and on-line, and deserve better coverage in Wikipedia than this one has gotten so far. -- Donald Albury^(Talk) 10:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.