Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumbening
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirected. FCYTravis 23:22, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dumbening
Delete I suspect this is a made up word, despite the claims of its author. Redirect From the tone of the writing, it sounds like this might have been deleted once before, and if so it would qualify for speedy. However, I don't know that for sure, and so won't nominate it there. I will also resist the urge to use this word in a sarcastic post, which is taking more willpower than I though I had. Icelight 18:58, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
- This article is dumbening Wikipedia. (My willpower is weak). Delete.--Scimitar parley 19:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
*Delete OR-Neologism Dicdef. The Literate Engineer 19:30, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- Redirect (without merge) to Made-up words in The Simpsons. Haukurth, that was a cromulent performance and you've embiggened this VFD. The Literate Engineer 23:18, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- Thank you :) Hey, I'm a literate engineer too. - Haukurth 23:41, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete (Deletening?) It's not a word, and even if it were, this ain't wiktionary. JDoorjam 19:37, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete neologism. Jaxl 19:55, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - we'd bettering being havening deletening this article. Anyone else seen the Chronicles of George? Rob Church 20:16, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Made-up_words_in_The_Simpsons#Dumbening. - Haukurth 22:04, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Gah! I knew I had seen in somewhere. Yes, a redirect would be more appropriate, although section redirects don't work, iirc. --Icelight 22:35, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Neologism. --Carnildo 22:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete — Linnwood (talk) 23:43, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete neologism. JamesBurns 03:59, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.