Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke Nukem 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-23 09:16Z

[edit] Duke Nukem 5

Duke Nukem 5 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:CRYSTAL. Article is mostly speculation on a game that may or may not be released superapathyman 22:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Sequel to a game (Duke Nukem Forever) that has been "in development hell" (under development but not released) for ten years and counting. Delete per "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", with option to recreate when a verifiable article can be produced from reliable attributable sources per Wikipedia:Attribution, not just in-house interviews posted on the company's website. -- saberwyn 23:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No. Just no. JuJube 00:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A sequel to a game that will probably never be released? ARGH, MY HEAD!!! Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 03:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 03:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Kill it. Kill it now. :( K1Bond007 05:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt the earth. When Duke Nukem Forever finally gets released, we can consider unprotecting this article and working with it. Cheers, Lankybugger 15:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Duke Nukem Forever (and redirect). Crypticfirefly 06:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I do hope this was a joke... BJ^Talk 13:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.