Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudicals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dudicals

Neologism, WP:NFT. Deprodded. Accurizer 13:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete dicdef. Turns up on Google, so I'm not willing to go with NEO or NFT, but it's still dicdef. Tychocat 13:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - calling it a dicdef is way too generous. Sounds more like a middle-school prank. --Rehcsif 13:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Dicdef, borderline NEO. Belongs on urbandictionary and, what do you know, it's already there. Fan1967 14:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete maybe could go in some bizarre list of slang, but not its own article. --Nscheffey(T/C) 14:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as nonsense,NN, and failing WP:NEO. --DarkAudit 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I actually made up the same word when I was 12, except it was "dudical" and was supposed to be used as an adjective.  :) I don't think either incarnation deserves a wikipedia entry. Amazinglarry 14:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete here as Dicdef. Obviously is in use (see Google), but fails WP:WINAD.—Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelMaggs (talk • contribs)
  • Well, i've heard the slang usage many time in my high school and it's no prank really. People use it a lot.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ienthekorean (talk • contribs)
  • Delete/redirect - Redirect with no merge to "Dude". If I typed in "dudical", I think I would probably want some information relating to dudes. Wickethewok 18:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a clever word that makes 12 year olds guffaw because it is a combination of DUDE and TESTICLES. Based on other contributions I've seen today, references to the male genitals and things that make 12 year old boys giggle must make up over half of Wikipedia's articles.george 18:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Wonderful edits, George! --MichaelMaggs 20:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't you mean dudicojones? Fan1967 19:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleticals "dudical" = (dude + radical)*1987 & it's an adjective. This definition is just wrong & stupid. And whatever "masulanizing" is, I don't wanna know. -- Scientizzle 19:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator, possibly a Wiktionary candidate but not suitable for Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 07:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete dic-def Eluchil404 18:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.