Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DudeZ

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:45, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DudeZ

Probably not notable, looks like vanity page. Thue | talk 19:31, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, NO forummer identity will EVER be Wiki-worthy unless it's George Bush or someone notable on the other end. This is just (wordhere)cruft. Master Thief Garrett 07:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If the article about ProtoWall is worth keeping, shouldn't it be mentioned in it that ProtoWall is written by someone calling himself DudeZ? Otherwise, delete them both. Wipe 09:35, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• ProtoWall gets only 12,000 Google hits--should we cull it too while we're at it? You know, because of that old saying, "cull two vain ads with one vote"... no, wait, did I just misquote that? hehehe... Master Thief Garrett 09:53, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- Vanity - Longhair | Talk 12:28, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, redirect to dude or something like that. Radiant_* 10:35, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Total vanity, no doubt. Svest 16:35, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.