Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duckduckmoose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Deb as patent nonsense. - Bobet 23:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duckduckmoose

Page describes a site that is not notable Jim 20:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Sorry, i dont follow you, could you re-phrase? The Site is there, just in the stages of a re-shuffle. ok. is it still ok to leave this here, and update when the site is back in working order?

• Delete and re-include when it is notable. Part of the problem is that the website isn't well-known enough to be listed here. WP:WEB for the guidelines for gauging notability. (Signed: J.Smith) 20:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.