Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubx

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:00, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dubx

Non-notable conlang. I tried to find how many hits Google returns, but most are of pages filled with nonsense text which by coincidence happen to have the characters "dubx" in them. Google gets one hit when searching for "dubx conlang." Whimemsz 01:32, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:41, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Two to seven speakers? It would be notable if it were a dying language, but not one just being developed. Mr Bound 02:14, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Come back when it has become an international way of communication as intended. (Constructed languages need major press attention, wide use and be out of the development phase.) - Mgm|^(talk) 09:25, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per MgM StopTheFiling 23:03, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable enough yet. Come back when it is.democracys 00:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, below the notability threshold. Can one describe in a sentence or two in what sense the language is notable in the world outside the Wikipedia? Not why the conlang is special, since every creative work is special, but in what sense it is notable, or what kind of attention it has gotten? --Cam 01:22, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.